To celebrate or not to celebrate! The same principle applies for Passover!
“The word for “Christmas” in Hebrew is “Hag Ha molad” – literally “The Festival of the Birth”.
What we should care about is the theology of Christmas, or the Nativity.
The Nativity and the Death and Resurrection of Christ is why we are Christian!
Passover and Christmas! Specific times when most Christians in this country commemorate central aspects of what we believe!
To let other people who have hangups with the Easter Bunny and Easter Eggs, The Guy in the Red Suit and Christmas Trees ruin Easter and Christmas for us should be reconsidered according to my opinion and because of reasons to follow!
I agree that some people and even Churches push it much to far and they should clean up their acts. But to rubbish Easter and Christmas in the way some people do by just getting on the heathen practice wagon without considering the lost opportunity with family and loved ones and evangelistic opportunity is probably a more loveless and ignorant approach than that of the people you are blaming of heathen practices!
I don’t do the Easter Bunny or the Christmas Tree thing at my house but I like Easter Eggs a lot because I like Chocolate! I will go to a gathering where there is a Christmas Tree and a Guy with a Red Suit if I am invited and focus on evangelizing and the much needed giving of grain and the truth.
In the old days and in many instances still Christians in this country are focused on the Lord over Passover and Christmas! There are other reasons why we still sit with the problems we have and those we have been debating rigorously and will keep doing so!
(So by the way I do have all the heathen practices facts)
I have about gone as far as breaking Christmas Trees and burning the Red Suit but I have in the process also broken relationships and burnt some bridges with what I sincerely thought to be the right way to act for the right reason! Today I have a more moderate approach and it is for each to make it out for him or herself and with The Lord. If you still feel the same after reading this presentation, so be it. Don’t judge other to this regard if they have another view on the practical implication in this case. There are many other more pressing issues we should be able to judge and discern that is neglected that worries me more!
Mat 23:24 “You blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel!
Mat 23:25 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside they are full of robbery and self-indulgence.
Col 2:16 Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day—
Col 2:17 things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ.
Col 2:18 Let no one keep defrauding you of your prize by delighting in self-abasement and the worship of the angels, taking his stand on visions he has seen, inflated without cause by his fleshly mind,
Col 2:19 and not holding fast to the head, from whom the entire body, being supplied and held together by the joints and ligaments, grows with a growth which is from God.
Rom 14:4 Who are you to judge the servant of another? To his own master he stands or falls; and he will stand, for the Lord is able to make him stand.
Rom 14:5 One person regards one day above another, another regards every day alike. Each person must be fully convinced in his own mind.
“The word for “Christmas” in Hebrew is “Hag Ha molad” – literally “The Festival of the Birth”.
It says in Romans 14:4 not to judge anyone for what religious festivals they celebrate, and along similar lines, it says in Colossians 2:16-18 not to let anyone judge you; it is a matter of culture and context that is strictly between you and the Lord. I could care less whether someone celebrates Christmas; it doesn’t matter to me.
What I do care about is the theology of Christmas, or the Nativity. When He was born, who knows? That He was born, we all know.”
“What does Christmas, the Nativity, have to do with the Last Days? This may surprise you, but the answer is everything.
You may have heard me say before that we will never understand the Second Coming of Christ until we understand His First Coming. What happened in His First Coming is replayed, recapitulated, in His Second Coming. When Jesus was born, the Roman emperor was Caesar Augustus – formerly Octavius. He was the first Roman emperor to be deified in his lifetime. Thus there was a Roman emperor presiding over the Roman Empire and being worshiped as a god when Jesus arrived the first time. This emperor took a census, ascribing numbers to people – not actually putting numbers onthem, but ascribing one to every person in the known world. There were actually two censuses taken by Augustus, both for this purpose: that he might gain financial control of the world. When Jesus comes back, the same thing will happen: we will have a resurrected Roman Empire headed by someone who is virtually deified. This demi-god will number people’s heads in order to economically control the world. What happened at Jesus’ First Coming will happen again at His Second. Christmas is not just a past event; it is a future event, a prophetic event.”
Hark, the herald angels sing,
Glory to the newborn King!
Peace on earth, and mercy mild,
God and sinners reconciled!
Joyful all ye nations, rise,
Join the triumph of the skies,
With the angelic hosts proclaim,
Christ is born in Bethlehem!
Hark, the herald angels sing,
Glory to the newborn King!.
May we approach this Christmas with a true Nativity angle and leave a wonderful fragrance wherever we go!
Geseënde Kersfees en Voorspoedige Nuwejaar >>>
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year >>>
Should Christians Celebrate Christmas? Amir Tsarfati!
CHRISTMAS: To Celebrate or Not Celebrate >>>
Recently I received two emails from good believing friends concerning non observance of Christmas based on the contents of two articles included below by Alan Franklin and Kevin Kleint. This is my considered response.
I have a very similar attitude as Alan & Pat Franklin towards Christmas. I do not celebrate it as such, recognizing that it’s commercial and aspects (largely borrowed from Pagan influences, such as ‘mistletoe’) have usurped the centrality of the Nativity. It is also a false method of bringing children happiness. As Moishe Rosen, founder of ‘Jews For Jesus’ stated: “Sana Clause (father Christmas) is a communist who dresses in red and only gives away things that other people pay for and corrupts children into thinking happiness comes primarily from material things.
Now I can indeed respect the legacy of the actual historical figure St. Nicholas who was pastor of the church of Ephesus during the final pagan persecution of the church in the 5th century when he was imprisoned for his faith in Christ. By historical reputation, he was known for his charity to the poor, apparently for evangelizing seamen (Ephesus was still a port city at that time), and for his love of children. These are Christian virtues any of us should espouse and I would have no issues with the real St. Nicholas. Indeed, I can admire the Christ-likeness of such Christians who demonstrate their faith through evangelism and charity to the poor and who demonstrate their faithfulness to Christ by remaining loyal to Him under conditions of persecution and imprisonment as the price for their faith. Who could have any problem with the true St. Nicholas (from what relatively little we actually know of him). The problem that I have is that Santa Clause with his flying reindeer (borrowed most likely from Nordic folk mythology), bears little or no resemblance to the real historical St. Nicholas. It is a distortion of him that the actual St. Nicholas (an ethnic Greek) would not have even recognized. In such countries as Holland, moreover, at least a distinction is made between St. Nicholas whose embellished legacy as ‘gift giver to children’ is celebrated on the 14th of December (arriving with his companion ‘Black Pete’ not by sleigh but by steamboat) distinct from Santa Clause on the 25th of December in the Latin & Protestant churches of the West and the 6th or 7th of January as celebrated by the Byzantian churches of the East. The January Christmas of the Eastern churches, known as ‘Epiphany’ in the liturgical calendar of the West, is where the cultural tradition of gift giving to children was originally seen as commemorating the Magi bearing gifts to the infant Jesus symbolic of His Kingship (Gold), His High Priesthood (Frankincense), and death & Resurrection (myrrh). But it culturally evolved and is still evolving (the famous red suit of Santa Clause replaced the original gold one when the Coca Cola company launched a massive advertising campaign in the early 20th century to have Santa Clause wear the colors of the Coca Cola brand). It is all fake.
There are, however, other reasons I personally do not like Christmas. I had a cousin die in the USA several months ago. He was a Certified Public Accountant (Chartered Accountant) in the New Jersey suburbs of New York City, and he was one of those relatives of whom I was quite fond but unfortunately did not get to see much of as I mainly live and work abroad. What is unusual was not only that he died youngish, but that he was a paternal cousin married to my first cousin maternally. I and my siblings are/ were related to both my cousin, who very sadly snuffed it, and to his widow. As a result, this holiday season I now face the unhappy task of calling for “the Holidays” to offer solace and further condolences to his widow (who is also my cousin). Christmas not only compounds the loneliness and compounds the emotional effects of bereavement on families recently bereft of loved ones such as the widow spending her first ‘Christmas’ alone in many year, but Christmas becomes an emotional cruelty perpetrated in the name of Christianity. This is to say nothing of the burden of social inferiority the materialistic event places on poor and disadvantaged children and to seriously ill children who must spend Christmas hospitalized (given our own children’s mission at Moriel for our Garbage dump children in the Philippines where poverty and Dengue fever are rife, it is a reality of which we are acutely aware). Such things make a mockery of the scriptural meaning of the Nativity, which is a God-given message of hope in and through the coming of Christ/ Messiah. Arguably, if Christmas was simply observed as a commemoration of the Nativity (the historical problem that we do not know for certain even the year, much less the day when Jesus was born not-with-standing), and if it had shed its pagan accoutrements, these objections might not feature in my adverse disposition towards Christmas to make a theological issue of it. But the social and cultural reality is that Christmas is neither simply nor even mainly about the Nativity. On the contrary, Christmas is mostly about worldly things and what is in actual essence mammon worship, that are in diametric adversity to any authentically scriptural perspective of the birth of Jesus. Yet the issue is more complex than this.
However extraneous to “Christmas” the Nativity Narratives are, two huge chunks of two of the four Gospels, they are vital to understanding the prophetic content for Revelation chapter 12 etc. And these two narratives inclusive of the genealogies are of doctrinal importance in everything from the Messianic apologetics required for the evangelization of Jews, to the refutation of liberal higher criticism in academic theology concerning the synoptic issue and source critical issues. They form the hermeneutical basis eschatologcally for furnishing us the typological paradigm for the end times prophetic interpretation of Revelation chapter 12, which is a quintessential New Testament example of midrashic pesher. An understanding of the Nativity is absolutely essential in understanding The Return of Christ. If we do not grasp the doctrinal theology of His first coming, we shall not be prepared for His Second Coming.
It would furthermore serve us all well as believers to be mindful of the fact that the current legal “kulturkampf” being waged against Christmas in school districts, shopping precincts and the like by anti Judeo-Christian atheist groups, by the damnable ACLU, and by left wing politicians, judges and bureaucrats desiring ‘political correctness’ by not offending Moslems with the public display of Judeo-Christian festive emblems is not in reality a war on Christmas, but a war on Christianity by the proponents of atheism and Islamic Sharia. In the USA we presently exist in a climate where enemies of the constitution, who are engaged in a war to destroy the First and Fourth Amendments, are also hell-bent (and they are literally bending towards hell as their probable destination) on redefining the constitutional ‘Freedom of Religion” to mean “Freedom from Religion”. Frequently, these are the same activists who disguise their anti Semitism with the camouflage of anti Zionism, although in a number of cases their ranks include both leftist Jews and ” liberation theology” so-called Christians, not realizing that the Saudi Wahabist funded organizations and Olenskyists pushing these agendas in actuality view them as Lenin’s proverbial “useful idiots” to be disposed of later.
This contemporary reality places someone like me in a very complicated situation. On one hand I do not like Christmas because of the aforementioned reasons. Simultaneously however I find myself in a situation where references to Christmas trees (of pagan origin) are being relabeled as ‘Holiday Trees’, and “Happy Christmas” is being called ‘Seasons Greetings’ because the Islamic and radical atheistic enemies of Christ want to purge not the “mas” but rather the “Christ” from public proclamation. Often the agenda driven activists who are the legal front-men for this crusade will exhibit no such objections to Islamic feasts such as Ramadan or Hindu Divali and will most certainly never show any concern that LGBT pride days being publicly exhibited offend the beliefs of Christians and practicing Jews. So by objecting to this campaign against Christmas because it is in fact rather a thinly disguised popular campaign against Christ, I am in the conundrum of either defending a quasi religious holiday I do not actually believe in or celebrate, or caving in to the forces of atheistic secularism propelled by its Darwinist ideology and incipient Islamic sharia restricting Christian observances as is done in Islamic countries under sharia which is what fundamentalist Islam is demanding and increasingly getting courtesy of the political cowards and hypocrites of the left. Defending something we believe in is straightforward; defending something we don’t truly believe in because its opponents are not about opposing Christmas but in reality opposing Christ makes the debacle much more complex. For me, and others like me, it is a convoluted no win/loose – loose dilemma. Only the devil could orchestrate such a mess.
Not least of all is the consideration of evangelism. In utterly post Christian/ Neo pagan Great Britain, many unsaved people will only attend church for cultural reasons. These are either rites of passage such as a wedding, a baby dedication or a funeral, or one of several holidays or special Sundays such as Christmas, Easter, Mothering Sunday (British Mother’s Day), or Remembrance Sunday (British Memorial Day honoring the war dead). Even in the USA where Easter church attendance is often nothing more than a stupid fashion show where after church people parade up and down in the “Easter Parade” showing off their Spring outfits while before church children devour chocolate eggs from baskets left by a mythical ‘Easter Bunny” (again, of pagan origin).. What any of this has to do with the resurrection of Jesus, I have no idea. To begin with all four gospels and 1 Corinthians make it clear that Jesus was crucified Erev Hag, not on Good Friday and that He arose Yom Rishon of Hag Matzot on the Hebrew feast of First Fruits, and not on Easter Sunday.
We use Jewish holydays to evangelize Jews, often showing Yeshua as the Messianic fulfillment of Yom Kippur and Pesach (Passover). We also thusly use Jewish holydays not prescribed in Torah in Leviticus 23 & 24 such as Chanukka and Purim.
Likewise, these rites of passage such as weddings, baby dedications, and funerals can likewise be used evangelistically to present the gospel to unsaved Jews and non Jews alike. The same is true for Christmas. For purely cultural reasons unsaved people may come to a carol service who would never otherwise set foot in a church. Christmas, despite its worldly trappings, can be turned around and used by The Lord to reach the lost. As much as we may dislike Christmas for a valid variety of reasons, I cannot object to using it as an opportunity to present the Gospel and for purely evangelistic considerations I have done so myself, whose souls on their way to hell will walk through the doors of a church for a wedding or a Carol Service or to remember their family war dead, and I know of no scriptural reason not to capitalize on it for the purpose of presenting the Gospel; indeed there may be no other time that they are going to hear it.
Once more, despite my rather sharp anti-Christmas convictions, there is an opposite side of the coin that I cannot reasonably ignore. Thus I take refuge in Colossians 2:16-19 and Romans 14: 4-5; it is a matter of individual conviction before The Lord not to be judged.
There is some religious website denouncing me as a “false prophet” not because I celebrate Christmas (I do not), but rather because I refuse to condemn churches and Christians who do!
The remarks of Keven Kleint however are less serious exegetically and therefore warrant far less attention. I found this true of his material generally (his attempted explanation of “legalism” negates to define legalism in contrast to Nomianism and anti-Nomianism).
Mr. Kleint seems to be symptomatic of the pseudo scholarship that permeates most (but not all) of the contemporary Messianic Movement in departure from the more serious caliber of Messianic scholarship pioneered by Alfred Edersheim and David Barren and that continued with Dr. Louis Goldberg and Rachmiel Fryland and on to Dr. Arnold Fruchtenbaum, Dr. Richard Robinson, and Dr. Michael Rydelnik today.
Mr. Kleint totally misses the pivotal passage of Romans 14 with regard to the New Testament issue of festal observance and the Pauline theology concerning it. His treatment of Galatians is flagrantly flawed. Galatians chapter 3 directly refers back to Acts 15 account of the Jerusalem Council. The apostolic prescription of this council delivered by James (Yakov) under the direct instruction of The Holy Spirit specified four required elements of Torah observance (which are derived from the Noahide covenant in the opinion of many conservative Evangelical theologians) that are compulsory for non-Jews. Festal observance is simply and plainly not one of them.
Mr. Kleint’s assertions are therefore implausible. The Sarah & Hagar pesher interpretation of Galatians 4 moreover is not likely something that would have been comprehensible to newly saved pagans. Mr. Kleint’s blatant lack of understanding of the Sitz im Leben of Galatia is repeated in his abject assumptions surrounding the church in Colossae & Laodicea.
His eisegetical treatment of the epistle to the Colossians is unsupportable. The church there had a mixture of Jewish and non Jewish believers (Col. 3:11) and his fanciful conclusion that Col. 2:16-19 applies only to pagan authorities judging non Jews in the church for observing Hebrew feasts is devoid of any contextual validation or exegetical substance. In fact, unlike in Corinth, the internal evidence of both Galatians and Colossians appears to strongly indicate that the non Jews were not pagans but Gentile “God Fearers” who had a belief in The God of Israel and knowledge of the scriptures from the Septuagint.
Mr. Kleint also omits any mention of the fact that temple observance by the Apostles etc. took place prior to 70 AD while there was a temple standing before Talmudic Judaism totally usurped Mosaic Judaism. He omits Paul’s festal theology as demonstrated in his paschal exposition in 1 Corinthians chapter. 5 & 11 which show that Paul held to a Messianic fulfillment of the Holydays as does the Epistle to Hebrews concerning Yom Kippur.
Most seriously lacking in his polemic is his categorical failure to note or address the fact that Yeshua Himself observed holidays not prescribed in Torah in both John 10 where Jesus observed Chanukka and Simcha Torah in John chapter 8 after the Simcha Beit Ha Shoyva fulfillment in John chapter 7 to say nothing of the fact that Old Testament Jews invented and celebrated Purim. For sure, because of the Book of Daniel and the divine intervention in the escapades of Mordechai & Esther, these holidays were not without spiritual meaning, but they were not included in the festal calendar of Leviticus and God never decreed their observance. While seeking to buttress his position on the fact that Christmas and Easter are not in scripture, he ignores the fact that Israel, the Jews and Jesus Himself did so.
Mr. Kleint just cannot be taken seriously. His conclusions are not scriptural justified and his mishandling of scriptural texts does not lend itself to credibility.
James Jacob Prasch
Dec 22, 2015
Christmas is Coming >>>
The word for “Christmas” in Hebrew is “Hag Ha molad” – literally “The Festival of the Birth”.
It says in Romans 14:4 not to judge anyone for what religious festivals they celebrate, and along similar lines, it says in Colossians 2:16-18 not to let anyone judge you; it is a matter of culture and context that is strictly between you and the Lord. I could care less whether someone celebrates Christmas; it doesn’t matter to me. What I do care about is the theology of Christmas, or the Nativity. When He was born, who knows? That He was born, we all know.
My family, being Israeli, celebrates Hanukah. It is Hanukah now. In John 10 Jesus celebrated Hanukah – the Feast of Dedication. This is very important in understanding the advent of Antichrist among other things through Antiochus Epiphanes and the Maccabees. We have a Hanukah party to which we invite unsaved Jewish people, which my family is doing this week while I am in America. Again, at our house we don’t have Christmas, we have the Nativity. We go to our church, and we go to the carol service; that’s all. We may do things for missions and for needy families, but nothing more than that. Christmas is strictly a church thing for us; we have Hanukah as our celebration.
Christmas and the Last Days
What does Christmas, the Nativity, have to do with the Last Days? This may surprise you, but the answer is everything.
You may have heard me say before that we will never understand the Second Coming of Christ until we understand His First Coming. What happened in His First Coming is replayed, recapitulated, in His Second Coming. When Jesus was born, the Roman emperor was Caesar Augustus – formerly Octavius. He was the first Roman emperor to be deified in his lifetime. Thus there was a Roman emperor presiding over the Roman Empire and being worshiped as a god when Jesus arrived the first time. This emperor took a census, ascribing numbers to people – not actually putting numbers on them, but ascribing one to every person in the known world. There were actually two censuses taken by Augustus, both for this purpose: that he might gain financial control of the world. When Jesus comes back, the same thing will happen: we will have a resurrected Roman Empire headed by someone who is virtually deified. This demi-god will number people’s heads in order to economically control the world. What happened at Jesus’ First Coming will happen again at His Second. Christmas is not just a past event; it is a future event, a prophetic event.
The book of Joel, the book of Revelation, and the Olivet Discourse tell us about signs in the sky and the cosmos heralding the return of Christ. Of course, as we know, there were signs in the sky and the cosmos heralding the birth of Christ. The Jews were in their own land, but under the thumb of this Roman emperor. How did he get there? By seduction – the Roman general, Pompeii, seduced the Jews and entered the Holy of Holies in the Temple. Whenever you see somebody other than the High Priest on the Day of Atonement entering the Holy of Holies, it is a picture in some way of the Antichrist. What happened with Pompeii in Rome will happen again. These events that we see happening in Europe and in the Middle East are setting the stage.
Jochanan ha Matbiel – John the Baptist – came in the spirit and power of Elijah. He was born just before Jesus and appeared just before Him. The prophet Malachi predicted that in some way, Elijah will come again; Jesus confirmed this.
There were many false prophets in Israel when Jesus came the first time, and many will be here when He comes back. The general backslidden state of the faith that should have believed in Him then is no different in many ways from the backslidden state of the faith that should believe in Him now.
Jesus’ First Coming teaches about His Second. Christmas is neither here nor there; the Nativity, however, is very important. If we do not understand how He came the first time, we will not understand His return. There are differences, of course, but one is a picture of the other.
I have spent a lot of my time for the past 20 years as an evangelist to the Jews thinking about one question: How could it be, with 2,000 years of history preparing for the Messiah to come, being in a covenant relationship with God and having the Scripture, that so few Jews were ready for Jesus to come the first time? Paul tells us that the devil blinded their eyes. (Rom. 11:25) There were 2,000 years of preparation for Jesus to come, Israel had a covenantal relationship with God, and they had the Scriptures. Yet in spite of all this, only a remnant was ready for Him to come. The same thing will be true when He comes back, only it will not only be Israel, but also the so-called church.
What kinds of Christians are going to be ready for Jesus to come again in the Last Days? If you want to know the answer to this, look at the kinds of Jews who were ready for Him to come the first time. If you want to know what kinds of Christians are not going to be ready for Him to come back, take a good look at the kinds of Jews that were not ready for Him to come the first time. His First Coming teaches about His Second; we will never understand His Second Coming until we understand His First. Obviously He will not come as a baby the second time, being born of an earthly mother. There are differences between the two comings, but essentially one prefigures the other.
Those Who Were Not Ready
Before we look at what kinds of Jews were ready for Jesus to come the first time, let’s look at Jews who were not ready. When we see what kinds of Jews were not ready, we will know what kinds of Christians will not be ready. A is to B as B is to C.
Turn with me, please, to Matthew’s Nativity narrative in Matthew 2:1:
“Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, saying, ‘Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him.’ When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born. So they said to him, ‘In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet: “But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, are not the least among the rulers of Judah; for out of you shall come a Ruler Who will shepherd My people Israel.”‘
What we see here is that some of the people who were ready for Jesus to come the first time were people whom you would not have expected to be ready. These Magi, or wise men, were from Persia. They were the chaplains of the ancient Medes and Persians. Somehow in ancient Persia there was a religion that has been changed over the centuries, called Zoroastrianism. It was monotheistic; they believed that there was one God and that man was responsible for his own sin. They believed there was a battle between the sons of light and the sons of darkness; they held similar beliefs, in other words, to those of the Essenes and the Christians.
During the Babylonian Captivity, when Persia overtook Babylon in fulfillment of Daniel’s prophecies, some of the Persian kings came to believe in the Jewish God, having already been predisposed to monotheism. There was a lingering Jewish influence in that place. We read about Esther, for example, and Darius the Mede, as well as the prophecy of King Cyrus by Isaiah the prophet over 200 years before Cyrus’ birth. We read in Ezra and Nehemiah what happened there. All the way through the Hasmonean period to the time of Jesus, the Persians favored the Jews. In fact, until the Shaw of Iran fell, the Persians – Iran – favored Israel. I have no doubt in my mind that the Prince of Persia, the principality against which Daniel prayed and fasted for three weeks (Dan. 10:13; 20), is still there today in the form of Shia Islam, that Islamic fundamentalism in Iran. People in modern Christian circles like to call demons like this one “territorial spirits”, which is not a good translation or interpretation. The Greek word is “arche”, the Hebrew word “shedim”; a better translation for these words is “principalities”, meaning demonic powers over nations. We have many crazy people today doing “binding and loosing”, among other nonsense, but there is no doubt about the fact that there are principalities over nations. The book of Daniel reveals that, and in Gerasenes the demons going into the swine begged Jesus not to send them out of the region. (Lk. 8:31-33) There are territorial spirits, if you want to use that term, although it is not a particularly good interpretation. They do exist. In Belfast, you see murals of ancient Celtic war gods on the walls, both in the neighborhoods where Protestants are recruited and in those where Catholics are recruited.
You see, those wise men understood how to interpret the signs of the time. Sadly, there are born-again Christians who cannot see the significance of contemporary events in the Middle East. They are blind to it, as if the book of Zechariah was not in the Bible. They cannot see what is happening in the EEC – they don’t understand the globalization of the world economy, the destruction of the environment, or any of these other signs, as wise men do.
So the Magi came to see the Messiah, non-Jews, people you would not have expected, because they saw the Star in the East. Here we see that they come to Jerusalem, where Herod heard them and was troubled – and all Jerusalem with him. This was the city where David said that the Messiah would come. This was where the Temple was; the focus of their identity and their Messianic hope, yet almost nobody who lived there wanted Him to come.
You will find many churches with the same attitude; drive up the road, look at the churches you pass, and ask yourself how many of them really want Jesus to come back. All Jerusalem was troubled; oh, they had the rituals, the liturgies, the festivities and the holidays, but when it looked like He was showing up, they were all troubled. Especially troubled were the national and religious leaders. Think about this.
It gets even more frightening, however – these guys knew the Scriptures. Herod wanted to know where the Messiah would be born, and they told him what Micah 5:2 said, that He would be born in Bethlehem. They had head knowledge of the Scriptures, but not heart knowledge. When He showed up, it was the last thing in the world that they either expected or wanted. Do you think it will be any different when He returns?
The Trap of Satan: Backsliding
Almost every lie of Satan perpetrated in the church today is designed with one purpose: to get God’s people to hope in this life and this world. By definition, that is what backsliding is. Kingdom-Now theology, Dominionism, Triumphalism, Calvinistic Reconstructionism – what are they all trying to do? Set up the kingdom now; trust in this life. Faith-prosperity, the money preachers – teaching the sin of covetousness and calling it faith, the worship of Mammon and calling it the worship of God – what is it about? Trusting in this life.
Gerald Coates and Rick Joyner say that the Rapture is a lie of the devil, a fantasy and a myth. They mock it, comparing it to Star Trek’s “Beam me up, Scotty”. What is their purpose? It is to cause the church to forget about the Rapture and trust in this life. What do you think the ecumenical movement is about? Building the brotherhood of man – once again, trust in this life. All Jerusalem was troubled when He came the first time, and Jerusalem will be troubled again when He returns – and I don’t just mean Jerusalem, Israel.
Their national and religious leaders, who knew the Scriptures, did not want Him to come. For 2,000 years God had been preparing them for His coming; the whole reason for their very existence as a nation and a people was His coming. Yet very few wanted Him to; and it will be no different when He returns.
Those Who Were Ready
But what kind of Jews were ready for Him to come? Let’s look: turn with me please to the gospel of Luke chapter one.
In Luke 1:46-55 we have the Magnificat, which if you read it in Greek would be a literary replay of the song of Deborah, found in Judges 5 from the Septuagint. The angel Gabriel – whose name means “mighty one of God” – came and told Mary that she was the greatest woman who ever lived. “Blessed are you among women – God Almighty is going to be physically incarnated inside of you.” Her name was not Mary, but Miriam, the same as Moses’ sister. The Hebrew root of “Miriam” is “bitterness”. She did not have blonde hair or blue eyes, but rather dark, Semitic features. She has also never been to Medjugorje, Guadalupe, Fatima, or Lourdes. Her name is Miriam, and she was probably no more than mid-teens in age when Gabriel gave her this momentous announcement.
What does the greatest woman who ever lived say in response to being told that that is who she is? Verse 46 and 47:
“‘My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior.'”
The greatest woman who ever lived called God her Savior, stating that she needed to be saved from her sins. If the greatest woman who ever lived needs a Savior, where does that put me? None is righteous, no not one. (Rom. 3:10) All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. (Rom. 3:23) The word “Theotokos”, “Mother of God”, is not in the Greek New Testament. She is told that she would be the mother of the Messiah, who would save His people from their sin, and she responds by saying “I rejoice in God my Savior”. God Almighty is going to be incarnated inside of her, and all she can say is that she needs to be saved!
If the greatest woman who ever lived states that she needs a Savior, I believe her. I do not believe that she would lie, and even if she did, God certainly would not put that lie in His Word. So, whom should I believe? Mary herself or the lie of the Immaculate Conception which claims that she was conceived without sin? What has happened is that you have the pseudo-Christianization of Minerva, Diana of Ephesus, etc., and the application of these to Mary in fulfillment of the prophecies of Ezekiel and Jeremiah. The Madonna with the baby was originally derived from Tammuz-worship, which Ezekiel contended with. Jeremiah warned of the worship of the Queen of Heaven.
Miriam said she needed a Savior. God would become a Man, take my sin and put it on His Son, the Messiah, and take His righteousness and put it on me. Why should God become a man to take my place?
When I was a young Christian I used the cliché “Jesus is my personal Savior”. However, I did not really understand all of what that meant. I thought it meant that He was my personal Savior because I personally accepted Him; but that is only half of what it means. What “personal Savior” means in its totality is that if I was the only person who ever sinned, He would have had to be born of Miriam and gone to that cross and risen from the dead just for me. For me alone; why should God die for me, a cocaine addict? Why should God become a man and die for me? Why should He rise from the dead to give me eternal life? Maybe for Miriam we can understand it more; yet she stated her need of a Savior.
The religious people did not think they needed a Savior; they had rituals and celebrations. The devil gets more people into hell with religion than he does with all the dope, all the immorality and gambling and alcohol abuse put together. Arguably, the two most influential people on human civilization have both been Jews: Karl Marx and Jesus Christ. There is a great difference between them; they are, in fact, on opposite ends of the spectrum except on one point: religion is the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on humanity. The Gospel is not religion, it is relationship!
“I need a Savior”; that is what Mary said. She was a teenage girl who was not concerned with Brittany Spears’ videos on MTV or with her own personal vanity. Her response was to state her need of a Savior. That is the kind of Jew who was ready for Him to come the first time.
I really like Miriam; I love Miriam, and esteem her. I think Miriam is sensational, is fabulous, is terrific, and I cannot wait to meet her. But I want nothing to do with the blonde bimbo that Mary has become due to the so-called Church.
Zecharias & Elizabeth
Miriam has some family: in Luke 1:5 & 6 we read about them:
“There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the division of Abijah. His wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elizabeth. And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.”
Now, remember that the Sanhedrin, the clergy, were corrupt – it was a racket. It was Hinn, Copeland, and Hagin; that is what it was like when Jesus came the first time. Yet despite the popular corruption and hypocrisy of the clergy, there were individuals within it who were righteous.
I know individual pastors in the Assemblies of God who are heartbroken over what has happened to that denomination. In England, I know Anglican vicars who are heartbroken over what has happened to the Church of England. I know Baptists who are heartbroken. As bad as it is, and as bad as it is going to get, there will be people like Zacharias who are righteous, devout, and godly. No matter how corrupt the system and its clergy become, they will not go along with it. There may not be many of them, but they will be there. That is the kind of Jew who was ready for Jesus to come the first time, and that is the kind of Christian who will be ready for Him to come again.
Let’s look still further: in Luke chapter 2:24 we read that Mary brought a pair of turtledoves as her sacrifice; she brought a poor person’s offering. There is a liar from America named John Avanzini who came to England and said that Jesus’ family was rich, not poor. One of our people asked him publicly at the meeting why, if that was the case, Mary brought a poor person’s offering; his response was to have the ushers usher her out. She asked the wrong question.
“And behold, there was a man in Jerusalem whose name was Simeon, and this man was just and devout, waiting for the Consolation of Israel, and the Holy Spirit was upon him.”
The Sanhedrin did not want Jesus to come; all Jerusalem was troubled, but Simeon was longing for Jesus to come. In fact, it was his only reason for staying alive – verse 26:
“And it had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he would not see death before he had seen the Lord’s Christ.”
Under the old Covenant, the Holy Spirit was only for certain people at certain times – high priests, kings, prophets, and certain other individuals. Only they had the Holy Spirit in some sense; not until after Pentecost was He for all who believed. The gifts of the Spirit then operated only in a primordial sense in and through those who had them. Verse 27:
“So he came by the Spirit into the temple. And when the parents brought in the Child Jesus, to do for Him according to the custom of the law”
(They got me when I was a baby, but they sure wouldn’t get me now. This, of course, means circumcision. When my son was circumcised at eight days old, I had to hold him and say the Hebrew prayers when the rabbi came in. The rabbi took a cotton ball, dipped it in some wine, and squeezed it into the baby’s mouth. I asked what the wine was for, and was told it was to deaden the pain. I said, “If that kid could see that knife, he’d ask for some Jack Daniels.”) But to return to the point, verse 28:
“he took Him up in his arms and blessed God and said, ‘Lord, You are letting Your servant depart in peace, according to Your Word; for my eyes have seen Your salvation which You have prepared before the face of all peoples, a light to bring revelation to the Gentiles, and the glory of Your people Israel.”
This man, Simeon, was filled with the Holy Spirit and had been promised that he would not die until he had seen the Messiah. He was old, his hair and teeth and eyesight were going, he couldn’t get a date, but he knew he would not die until Jesus had come. He had what we call in New Testament terms the gift of faith.
The New Testament does tell us that we all have a measure of faith. We’re saved by grace through faith, (Eph. 2:8) without faith it is impossible to please God, (Heb. 11:6) and anything not done in faith is sin (Rom. 14:23), Scripture tells us. Separate from this, however, is the gift of faith, which not all of us have. It is the capacity to trust God absolutely for things that are not specifically written in Scripture, which the Holy Spirit has revealed to you. Most people with this gift are intercessors. Hebrew and Greek both make a distinction between prayer and intercession. People who have this gift can truly intercede in prayer, believing and knowing – not wishfully thinking, or trusting in the futility of their own minds – but holding on to a promise they know by faith that God has truly given them. Although he probably would have denied it himself, I would say that George M?ller in England had that gift of faith; he took in many, many street kids and would need astronomical sums of money by the next day, then pray and miraculously receive it in time.
Just think of this old man, longing for the Consolation of Israel, filled with the Holy Spirit. He only wanted Jesus to come – that was all he cared about, and it was the only reason he had to get out of his bed in the morning.
Not only was there a little old man, there was also a little old lady. In verse 36 of Luke 2 it says this:
“Now there was one, Anna, a prophetess, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher.”
(Forget British Israelism and Armstrongism; these people kept their tribal identities into the second and even third centuries.)
“She was of a great age, and had lived with a husband seven years from her virginity; and this woman was a widow of about eighty-four years, who did not depart from the temple, but served God with fastings and prayers night and day. And coming in at that instant she gave thanks to the Lord, and spoke of Him to all those who looked for redemption in Jerusalem.”
For years and years and years all this little old lady did was pray, fast, and serve God in His house. Then she just couldn’t stop telling people about Jesus – all those who were looking for the redemption of Israel. The world finds young women attractive; God is different. Read the book of Proverbs – God finds older women attractive, in the spiritual sense. Here was this little old lady, whose whole life was spent in prayer and service to God, and finally in telling people about Jesus. That was the kind of Jew who was ready for Jesus to come the first time; and that is exactly the kind of Christian who will be ready for Him to return.
Faithful Shepherds: Then and Now
But then, back in Luke 2: 8, there were some shepherds:
“Now there were in the same country shepherds living out in the fields, keeping watch over their flock by night. And behold, an angel of the Lord stood before them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were greatly afraid. Then the angel said to them, ‘Do not be afraid, for behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy which shall be to all people. For there is born to you this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.'”
Followed of course in verse 14 in the Latin Vulgate by, “Gloria in Excelsis Deo” – “Glory to God in the highest”.
The Hebrew word for “shepherd” and “pastor” is the same word; the same applies in Greek. These are shepherds who watch their flock – not hirelings. There is a great spiritual darkness coming at the end of the age; you have heard me point it out a number of times:
“Watchman, watchman, how far is the night?” (Is. 21:11)
“Is He coming in the second watch of the night or the third?” (Mk. 13:35)
“He is coming like a thief in the night.” (1 Th. 5:2)
“Work while you have the light, for night will come when no man can work.” (Jn. 9:4)
But there will be those faithful shepherds who watch over their flock no matter how dark it gets.
I once did a conference with Chuck Missler at which I saw an English-born pastor from Zimbabwe, where terrible things are happening. He was in England for a few days and when asked how he was he replied by expressing his thanks for the prayers said on his behalf. He told us how bad things were in Zimbabwe and that most of the white people as well as the educated blacks had left or were leaving. I asked if I would be seeing him around and he replied that I would not because he was returning to Zimbabwe the next day. “My sheep are there,” he said. Here is a white man who gives his whole life to take care of black people who are dying of AIDS; they are his sheep. I know a good Christian doctor who could make a good living in America who is down there with him. They aren’t leaving; why? It’s a dark place and it’s getting darker, but they are shepherds. That is the kind of Jew who was ready for Jesus to come the first time, and that is the kind of Christian who will be ready for Him to return.
Who is not going to be ready? “Herod mourned, and all Jerusalem with him.” The Sanhedrin were troubled. The theologians were pulling their hair out. They won’t be ready – people like that rarely are. But the individual clergy like Zacharias and his dear wife, or Joseph the foster father of Jesus – a man who was just, or a teenage girl who said, “I need a Savior”, or the shepherds who watched their flocks, or a little old lady whose whole life was spent in prayer and serving God and telling others about Jesus, or an old man who longed for Him to come and was filled with the Spirit of God – they are a different story. They were the kinds of Jews, who were ready for Him to come the first time, and I promise you, they will be the kinds of Christians who are ready for Him to come the second time.
My prayer for all of you, for your families, for myself and for my family, when I look at these Jews who were ready for His first coming, is that by the grace of the God of Israel we will be among the faithful who will be ready the second time. My dear brethren in Jesus, make no mistake about it: Christmas is coming.
My favorite Christmas carol is Hark the Herald Angels Sing for this reason: the music was composed by Felix Mendelssohn, a Jew, and the words were written by Charles Wesley, a Gentile Christian. It is one of the greatest Jew-Gentile collaborations I know of. Would you join me in singing it?
Hark, the herald angels sing,
Glory to the newborn King!
Peace on earth, and mercy mild,
God and sinners reconciled!
Joyful all ye nations, rise,
Join the triumph of the skies,
With the angelic hosts proclaim,
Christ is born in Bethlehem!
Hark, the herald angels sing,
Glory to the newborn King!
The Nativity And Christmas Story December 17 2015
Chanukah – Christmas and the Return of Christ Pt 1
Chanukah – Christmas and the Return of Christ Pt 2
Chanukah – Christmas and the Return of Christ Pt 3
Church Traditions Christmas Easter
Kersfees / Paasfees / Christmas / Easter
Die tyd raak min, maak maar seker jou eskatologiese vertrekpunte is korrek!